Legal Opinion

William F. Haakinson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1956No. 15503_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

An officer of a state bank in Iowa was found guilty by a jury of having violated 18 U.S.C.A. § 1010, in its provision that “Whoever, * * * for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of such [Federal Housing] Administration, makes, passes, utters, or publishes any statement, knowing the same to be false, * * * shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both”.

He has appealed, contending that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction against him, and that the trial court therefore erred in denying his motion for a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. R. I. McClanahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. William MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. State v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. Juan Gerardo RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Earl Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API