Johnson v. McNeilus Truck & Manufacturing, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentCobb, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. I write first to note my continued concern with this Court’s inclination to intrude into areas properly reserved to the trial court’s discretion, with the added detriment of unduly expanding this Court’s “piecemeal” appellate jurisdiction. Previously, this Court sought to avoid reviewing cases in such a fashion and quoted with approval the federal plan of constraining the use of extraordinary writs:
“ ‘In strictly circumscribing piecemeal appeal, Congress must have realized that in the course of judicial decision some interlocutory orders might be erroneous. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Wood v. Santa Barbara Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Garza v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Ex Parte TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.