Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 30, 1976No. 71 C 42PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRAMWELL, District Judge.

Defendant, Marine Midland Bank — New York (the “Bank”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff,, John R. Freeman (“Freeman”) cross moves to join the Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”) as a party defendant and for partial summary judgment dismissing defendant’s counterclaim pursuant to Rules 19 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I

In a complaint filed January 12, 1971, Freeman alleges that the Community Bank 1 extended credit to him for the purpose of purchasing and carrying…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,847 Utah State University of Agriculture and Applied Science v. Bear, Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Samuel STERN, Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. Bresnahan v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Abondolo v. Jerry WWHS Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API