Legal Opinion

Deeter v. Dull Corp., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1992No. 03090PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County sustaining appellee Dull Corporation, Inc.’s (“Dull”) preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing appellants’ Gary L. Deeter (“Deet er”) and Allen R. Kramer (“Kramer”) amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

On February 13, 1991, Deeter and Kramer filed a complaint against Dull to recover damages they allegedly sustained while in the course of their employment. 1 Deeter and Kramer alleged that Dull was liable for their injuries by breaching its…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jones v. LevinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Presbyterian Medical Center v. BuddSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Brown, D. v. The End Zone, IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Riverview Carpet & Flooring, Inc. v. PresbyterianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Bleam v. Gateway Professional Center AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API