Deeter v. Dull Corp., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County sustaining appellee Dull Corporation, Inc.’s (“Dull”) preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing appellants’ Gary L. Deeter (“Deet er”) and Allen R. Kramer (“Kramer”) amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.
On February 13, 1991, Deeter and Kramer filed a complaint against Dull to recover damages they allegedly sustained while in the course of their employment. 1 Deeter and Kramer alleged that Dull was liable for their injuries by breaching its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Sullivan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jones v. LevinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Presbyterian Medical Center v. BuddSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Brown, D. v. The End Zone, IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Riverview Carpet & Flooring, Inc. v. PresbyterianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Bleam v. Gateway Professional Center AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.