Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1981No. 805SC1193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

All of the assignments of error relate, to a substantial degree, to Judge Fountain’s refusal, in the face of repeated requests throughout the course of the trial on 21 August 1980, to appoint an attorney to represent defendant. We hold that the judge acted properly in each instance to which defendant took exception.

Defendant’s primary contention is that the court was required to assign counsel for his representation on the day of the trial even though he had previously signed two waivers of this right and had told Judge Fountain on several occasions, including the very day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. HarvinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API