Legal Opinion

State v. Watts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1977No. 7626SC840PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion to have counsel assigned to represent him and in denying his motion to continue the case for a “couple of weeks” to give him an .opportunity to obtain a lawyer. In State v. Smith, 27 N.C. App. 379, 219 S.E. 2d 277 (1975), in which the facts were remarkably similar to the facts in the present case, Judge Clark wrote,

“In this case the defendant delayed until the day his case was scheduled for trial before moving to withdraw the waiver and have counsel assigned. If this tactic is employed successfully, defendants will be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API