Legal Opinion
Russell v. City of Farmington Hills
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2002No. 01-2212PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vayda S. Russell, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing her civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking $500,000,000, Russell, a condominium owner, filed a purported class action suit against the City of Farmington Hills, Michigan, its City Tax Assessor, the Oakland County Tax Assessor, Italo-Ameriean Condominium Corp.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Shepard Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- James Boyd and Elizabeth Boyd v. Ford Motor Company Rouge Steel Company the Motor Vessel Ms. Henry Ford IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Calvin Berthelsen v. Maurice KaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Armisted v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- In re Royal Manor Management, Inc.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Griffin v. ReznickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Felts v. Cleveland Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
- U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.