Legal Opinion

State v. Raley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1954No. 7856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, P. J.

The defendants, appellants herein, were indicted separately for contempt of the Ohio Un-American Activities Commission, created and organized in accordance with the provisions of Sections 76-28 to 76-35, inclusive, General Code, as supplemented by the Act of the General Assembly passed on June 1,1951 (124 Ohio Laws, 795), now Sections 103. 31 to 103.38, inclusive, Revised Code. By agreement the cases were consolidated for trial in the Common Pleas Court. By entry of court on agreement of counsel they have been consolidated for the purpose of this appeal.

The plaintiff, appellee herein, will be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Ex Parte DorrSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  5. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Morris v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. State v. LevittIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. LevittIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. in Re: Giant Eagle, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API