Legal Opinion
Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Warren
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 8, 2011PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: LEVY, MEAD, and GORMAN, JJ.
Dissent: JABAR, J.
GORMAN, J.
[¶ 1] This case arises from an investigation by the Board of Overseers of the Bar (the Board) into the actions of six Verrill Dana LLP attorneys — David E. Warren, James T. Kilbreth III, Eric D. Altholz, Mark K. Googins, Roger A. Clement Jr., and Juliet T. Browne — who were involved in the discovery and reporting of the misconduct of John Duncan, a former partner in the law firm. The Board, acting through Bar Counsel, appeals1 from a prehearing discovery order entered by a single justice of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Violette)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Hanley v. EvansSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Cayer v. TOWN OF MADAWASKASupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Board of Overseers of the Bar v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harris Management, Inc. v. Paul CoulombeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Susan R. Snow v. Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- F. Lee Bailey v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- In re JonasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Petition of Edwin R. Jonas III for Reinstatement to the Bar of the State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.