Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Violette)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 19, 1999No. 99-1734PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This matter presents an issue of first impression: whether the nascent psychotherapist-patient privilege encompasses a so-called “crime-fraud exception,” parallel to that which we previously have recognized anent the attorney-client privilege. We hold that the privilege entails such an exception and that the exception applies here. We therefore affirm the district courtís order enforcing grand jury subpoenas served upon a pair of psychiatrists.

I. BACKGROUND

To protect the secrecy of ongoing grand jury proceedings, we limit our review of the facts to the bare essentials.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Stidham v. ClarkKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. United States v. Steven Gene ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API