Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Roark
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 22, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINFELD, Justice.
On March 30, 1969, lolene Roark and her eleven-year-old daughter Elizabeth sustained personal injuries when they were involved in an automobile accident with Clay Daniel. At the time of the accident Daniel carried automobile liability insurance with United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (hereinafter USF&G). The Roark automobile was insured by appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm). The Roark policy afforded liability, collision, medical payments of $500 per person, and certain other coverages. Mrs. Roark incurred medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bernardini v. Home & Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Davenport v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Peller v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Associated Insurance Service, Inc. v. GarciaKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Smith v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Lawson v. Helton Sanitation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Associated Insurance Service, Inc. v. GarciaKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Christopher Boling v. Prospect Funding Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.