Legal Opinion

McKinnon ex rel. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Studebaker Sales Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 10, 1927No. Gen. No. 31,655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff brought an action of assumpsit against the defendant to recover the value of an automobile which, it was alleged, plaintiff had delivered to the defendant for minor repairs and which the defendant refused and failed to return to her. A general demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s amended declaration. Plaintiff elected to stand by the amended declaration, the suit was dismissed and this appeal follows, so that the question involved is: Did the amended declaration state a cause of action?

The amended declaration alleged in. substance that the defendant was the owner and proprietor of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byalos v. MathesonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Vose v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Allen & Arnink Auto Renting Co. v. United Traction Co., New York County Courts1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon ex rel. Security Insurance v. CurrentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. Osgood v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API