Legal Opinion
Danziger v. Demolition Board
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 1989No. 6766PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiffs appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their administrative appeal from an order of the defendant, the demolition board of the city of Stamford. We conclude sua sponte that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ administrative appeal, and we therefore find error in the form of the judgment dismissing the appeal because that judgment was rendered on the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims, rather than on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Sections 90-1 through 90-19 of the Stamford Code of Ordinances provide for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Long v. Zoning Commission of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- State v. VachonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Charles Holdings, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Diaz v. Board of Directors of 1967 Police Pension FundConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Edwards v. Code Enforcement CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- October Twenty-Four, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Winthal v. FabriziConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Brown v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Danziger v. Demolition BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Frumento v. North Branford Wpca, No. 341224 (Mar. 29, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.