Legal Opinion

Hessler v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-139PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROTH, District Judge.

This is an asbestos action, originally filed in Delaware Superior Court by Paul Hes-sler, now deceased, and his wife to recover damages incurred by Mr. Hessler having been stricken with asbestosis. The Hes-slers are citizens of Delaware. When the action was first filed, some of the defendants were citizens of Delaware. Now, however, all but two defendants, Raymark Industries, Inc. (Raymark) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan), have settled. These two remaining defendants are foreign corporations. On March 8, 1988, Raymark and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. Altamil Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
  2. Erdey v. American Honda Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1978
  4. Erdey v. American Honda Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Entrekin v. Fisher Scientific Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  2. Golden Apple Management Co. v. GEAC Computers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Broderick v. DellasandroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Smith v. Bally's HolidayDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  5. Sunburst Bank v. Summit Acceptance Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API