Legal Opinion
Lee v. Altamil Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided October 10, 1978No. 78-568-Civ-J-MPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELTON, District Judge.
This cause was initiated in the Florida courts in August of 1977, and the present defendant, Altamil Corporation, was substituted for the original defendant by virtue of an amended complaint served on Altamil on November 3, 1977. The plaintiff’s claim is based upon “serious permanent injury” sustained by the plaintiff as an alleged proximate result of a defective component of a bulk feed tank and conveying system sold by the defendant. Substantively, this case is grounded on state law.
Following the filing of this case in state court, the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gilardi v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Camden Industries Company, Inc. v. Carpenters Local Union No. 1688, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Horak v. Color Metal of Zurich, SwitzerlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968
- Camden Industries Co. v. CARPENTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1688District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1965
3Cited by33 opinions
- Adam Frederick Chapman v. Powermatic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Mielke v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Broderick v. DellasandroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Carroll v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Rollwitz v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.