State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
This review by certiorari questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support an Industrial Commission award reopening respondent’s claim on the basis that he had sustained an “additional” disability. We find the evidence does not support the award.
On March 24, 1971, respondent, Hector Hernandez, suffered an industrial back injury, diagnosed as a superficial laceration of his right back and a traumatic myositis. His claim for workmen’s compensation benefits was accepted by petitioner insurance carrier, and benefits continued until terminated by Notice of Claim Status…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Altamirano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Elliott v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Hurley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Moffett v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capitol Foundry v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Ryan v. Grinnell CorporationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Arizona State Welfare Department v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976