Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gale

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Minnehaha county court. Hon. W. A. Wilkes, Judge. Action by Edgar L. Smith against Artemas Galo to recover upon an appeal bond. Prom an order overruling a de murrer to the complaint, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal from an order made by the county court of Minnehaha county overruling a demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was interposed upon the' ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In 1896 the plaintiff recovered judgment against Paul S. Knowles and Gale S. Carpenter for ¡?85 and interest, alleged to be due as rent for certain premises in .the city of Sioux Palls. Prom this judgment the defendants took an appeal to the circuit court of Minnehaha county, and executed and filed with the justice the usual printed form of a *163statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cutler v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Cabe & Hobson Ltd. v. SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Cent. Lumber & Mill Co. v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Harris v. J. Regester & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. State ex rel. Stow v. City Council of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grimsrud Shoe Co. v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Frick C. v. HoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Matheson v. F. W. Johnson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Lustig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API