Estate of Osborne

I am unable to join in the well-reasoned opinion of the majority because my examination of the record and the *219decisional law of this Commonwealth leads me to conclude that we have no appealable issues before us.

As I see it, the Order of October 23, 1984,1 is not a final order, and the final sentence therein so states that “[j]urisdiction is retained.” This implicates the filing of post-trial motions pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 227.1 and the entry of a final order after disposition thereof. The record before us discloses the filing of no such motion or order.

Pa.R.C.P. 227.1 provides:

Rule 227.1.…