Legal Opinion

In re Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the District Judge, who tried the case below in which petitioners wore convicted, to sign the bill of exceptions which they have tendered. It appears that the United States attorney has tiled objections to this bill, and that the judge, after going over it carefully, has directed that certain changes be made and that certain omitted testimony be included. He has not as yet signed any hill of exceptions, but lias allowed petitioners until January 29th to present for signature a hill prepared in accordance with his rulings.

We think that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camden Iron Works Co. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Scaife v. Western North Carolina Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API