In Re Lillian Laurence Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION RE REVISED APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF EMPLOYMENT NUNC PRO TUNC
S. MARTIN TEEL, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Counsel for the debtor in possession has filed a revised application for approval of employment nunc pro tunc to the commencement of the case and for interim compensation for the period from October 31, 1986 through November 30, 1989. The U.S. Trustee objects to the application on the grounds that counsel’s initial application for employment was untimely, that counsel failed to file a revised application in a timely fashion, and that counsel failed to disclose a conflict of interest…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re RobertsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- In Re Kendavis Industries International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
- In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- In the Matter of Arkansas Company, Inc., a New York Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Benenson & Scher, P.A., Attorneys for the Creditors Committee of Arkansas Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Guy Apple Masonry Contractor, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lazzo v. Rose Hill Bank (In Re Schupbach Investments, L.L.C.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Hardy v. Ross (In re Hardy)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barber v. Reynolds Motor Leasing Co. ( in Re My Type, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re: Latricia L. HardyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018