Legal Opinion
State v. Musto
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 24, 1983PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 N.J. Super. 106 (1983)
456 A.2d 114
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM V. MUSTO, CITY OF UNION CITY AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF UNION CITY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. WILLIAM V. MUSTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CARMEN A. ORECHIO AND THE NEW JERSEY SENATE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 4, 1983.
Decided January 24, 1983.
Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.
Thomas A. De Clemente argued the cause for appellant (De Clemente & Klitzner, attorneys; John C. Caniglia on the brief).
Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Behnke v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. MurzdaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Smith v. PentaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
3Cited by22 opinions
- McCann v. Clerk of City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. HeitzmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Cedeno v. Montclair State UniversitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Vas v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Moore v. Youth Correctional InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.