Legal Opinion
State v. Heitzman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 8, 1986PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
209 N.J. Super. 617 (1986)
508 A.2d 1161
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM C. HEITZMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 19, 1986.
Decided May 8, 1986.
Before Judges KING, SIMPSON and SCALERA.
Robert A. Farkas argued the cause for appellant (Marinari & Farkas, attorneys).
Gerard Boruch, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
The majority opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.
On this appeal defendant contends that his guilty plea should have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Douglas Fruchtman v. Frank Kenton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. KovackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. MarzolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Makwinski v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Flagg v. Essex County ProsecutorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SainzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.