Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 13, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 2:14-cr-00236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the determination of whether there is a factual basis for Defendant’s plea. For the reasons discussed herein, the Court FINDS that there is a factual basis for the plea.

I. Background

This case arises out of Defendant’s killing of Branda Mae Delight Basham—an informant for the Metropolitan Drug Enforcement Network Team (“MDENT”). The pertinent facts are as follows.

A. The Relevant Policies and Procedures of Local and Federal Authorities

“MDENT ... is a multi-jurisdictional task force with a primary…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Joe Roger LaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State of West Virginia v. Joe Roger LaneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API