Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of West Virginia v. Joe Roger Lane

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2019No. 17-1066Separate

1DissentArmstead, J.

The application of West Virginia's recidivist statute, set forth in W. Va. Code §§ 61-11-18(c) and 61-11-19 (2000) (read in para materia , hereinafter "recidivist statute"), has undergone a significant transformation by this Court over the past four decades. Beginning with Wanstreet v. Bordenkircher , 166 W. Va. 523, 276 S.E.2d 205 (1981), this Court has gradually strayed from a straightforward and consistent application of the clear language of the statute to engage in an ever-evolving effort to reformulate the statute and impose a myriad of hurdles to its application. While this evolution…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. EpperlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API