Legal Opinion
People v. Garrett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 10, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The day after he concluded his cross-examination of the two complainants, the defendant’s attorney stated that the Rosario material with which he had been supplied contained no statements by the complainants to the New York City Department of Correction (hereinafter the Department of Correction). The defendant’s attorney noted that the complainants, as the key prosecution witnesses, were Department of Correction employees, and the Department of Correction had apparently investigated the incident. The defendant’s attorney asserted that the complainants would have been…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. KepplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. ForrestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
4Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NusbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Johnson v. George A. Fuller Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. GuillaumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.