Legal Opinion
The Beryllium Corporation v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 1, 1955No. 11505_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
An assured under a comprehensive general liability poIicy sued its insurer on the policy in the digtrict court and obtained judgment in its favor. The insurance company appeals. Pennsylvania ]aw g0verns this diversity action,.. The policy m suit is a “Comprehensive General Liability Policy.” Its pertinent , . , • . , . claUse 1S deslgnated Coverage A— Bodil Injury Liability”. It reads:
To pay on behalf of the insured a^ sums which the insured shall become obligated to pay by reason of the liability imposed upon him by law, or assumed by him under contract as defined…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Canadian Radium & Uranium Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Springfield Township v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Billo v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Moffat v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Wolk v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961
- City of Fulton v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.