Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. J. G. Menihan Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 13, 1940No. 252Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

Though Judge SWAN’S opinion is persuasive indeed, I think it results in an order for the payment of government funds to private persons without' authorization of law. Even as between private litigants, costs, at least in an equity suit, are not a matter of right to a litigant, but are purely at the discretion of the court. Gold Dust Corp. v. Hoffenberg, 2 Cir., 87 F.2d 451, 453; Ex parte Peterson, 253 U.S. 300, 317, 40 S.Ct. 543, 64 L.Ed. 919; Payne, Costs in Common Law Actions in the Federal Courts, 21 Va.L.Rev. 397, 399. And costs *943are never awarded, against the United States except where…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API