Legal Opinion

Hanford v. Duchastel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an order made by Chief Justice Gummere quashing a writ of attachment on the ground that the affidavit upon which the writ was issued did not set forth a cause of action.

We are of the opinion that the writ was properly quashed.

Putting out of view the allegations respecting the defendant’s non-residence, the affidavit, stripped of its verbiage, sets forth the following matters of fact:

On July 3d, 1913, in New York City, the plaintiff entrusted to Butts & Vining, her attorneys, $14,000, to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Millhurst Milling & Drying Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Barnes v. P. D. Manufacturing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Burleigh v. SartainSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Life Insurance v. American National BankRichmond Chancery Court, Virginia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API