Legal Opinion

Burleigh v. Sartain

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The affidavit for attachment was entitled in a supposed cause, between appellant as plaintiff and respondents as defendants. It states that affiant is "the plaintiff in the above stated cause," and speaks of Paul J. Sartain and John V. Rice, Jr., "who are the defendants in said cause," and that "neither of said defendants has a residence or place of abode in the State of New Jersey,"c.

The motion to vacate the order for attachment and to quash the writ was heard and decided by Mr. Justice Trenchard, who communicated his conclusions to counsel in letter form, as follows:

"Since the affidavit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  2. Milliken v. SelyeNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Humphrey v. CandeNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  4. Foster v. Bay Front Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Hanford v. DuchastelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Korb v. Newspaper PM, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API