Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry
Supreme Court of the United States
1ConcurrenceJustice Brennan
I agree that the attack on the New Mexico statute as an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce has no merit and therefore join Part I of the Court’s opinion. The attack based on the Supremacy Clause — the contention that the Federal Communications Act preempts the subject matter of this state regulation — is not; however, so easily answered. Although I conclude that it too cannot prevail, I think it is appropriate that I state separately my reasons for reaching that result. For only recently we held, in Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc., 360 U. S. 525, that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.