Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Arar v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 2008No. Docket 06-4216-cvPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSack, Circuit Judge

I. OVERVIEW

Last year, in Iqbal v. Hasty, 490 F.3d 143 (2d Cir.2007) (Newman, J.), cert. granted sub nom. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2931, — L.Ed.2d -, 76 U.S.L.W. 3417 (U.S. June 16, 2008) (No. 07-1015), “[w]e ... recognize[d] the gravity of the situation that confronted investigative officials of the United States as a consequence of the 9/11 attacks. We also reeognize[d] that some forms of governmental action are permitted in emergency situations that would exceed constitutional limits in normal times.” Id. at 159 (citation omitted). But, we pointed out,

most ... rights ... do…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API