Kivela v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentCavanagh, J.
The issue in this case is whether the Fourth Amendment1 exclusionary rule precludes the use of unconstitutionally seized evidence in a Michigan jeopardy tax assessment proceeding. The majority states that under the federal rule the illegally seized evidence may be used in this civil tax case. Mallett, J., ante at *240224-225.2 I disagree. I dissent because I believe that under the prevailing federal authority, the exclusionary rule clearly precludes use of the evidence in this jeopardy tax proceeding. This conclusion is based on the quasi-criminal nature of the tax fraud penalties and of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.