Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kivela v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1995No. 97196, (Calendar No. 12)Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Fourth Amendment1 exclusionary rule precludes the use of unconstitutionally seized evidence in a Michigan jeopardy tax assessment proceeding. The majority states that under the federal rule the illegally seized evidence may be used in this civil tax case. Mallett, J., ante at *240224-225.2 I disagree. I dissent because I believe that under the prevailing federal authority, the exclusionary rule clearly precludes use of the evidence in this jeopardy tax proceeding. This conclusion is based on the quasi-criminal nature of the tax fraud penalties and of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API