Legal Opinion
Joloza v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 22, 2008No. 485 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Tengo S. Joloza (Joloza) appeals pro se from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which sustained the uncontested preliminary objections filed by the Department of Transportation (Department) in response to a complaint filed by Joloza. We vacate and remand.
On June 28, 2006 Joloza filed a petition with the trial court which was entitled:
TENGO S. JOLOZA MOTIONS THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA TO AWARD THE PLAINTIFF TWO HOUNDRED (SIC) AND TEN THOUSANDS (SIC) DOLLARS, FROM DAMAGES SUSTAIN [ED] AS THE RESULT OF PA DOT…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schuylkill Navy v. LangbordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Cowell v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Smith v. Transportation Workers, Local 234Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kittrell v. WatsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- J.T. Miller v. PA BPP and Siena House C.C.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Joloza v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011