Legal Opinion

Harbor Island Holdings, L.L.C. v. Kim

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 2003No. G030264PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

A landlord, displeased with its tenant, reluctantly agreed to a lease extension requiring greatly increased rental payments. The landlord demanded one price if the tenant complied with the lease agreement in every regard and double that amount in the event of any breach. After the conclusion of the extended lease term, the landlord sued the tenant, seeking both damages occasioned by the tenant’s failure to properly maintain the premises, plus nearly a quarter of a million dollars for the doubled rent. The trial court awarded damages for the failure to maintain the property,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ridgley v. Topa Thrift & Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Diamond Benefits Life Ins. Co. v. TrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Fox Chicago Realty Corp. v. Zukor's Dresses, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Grand Prospect Partners v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Greentree Financial Group, Inc. v. Execute Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API