Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gerard and Gemma Brault v. Town of Milton

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 1, 1975No. 555, Docket 74-2370Published

1DissentTimbers, Circuit Judge

With deference, I respectfully decline to join in the majority’s discovery of a federal cause of action for damages against a municipality springing directly from the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Despite the majority’s ingenuity in suggesting that such a cause of action may be supported by what it characterizes as the “sweeping approbation of constitutionally-based causes of action” which the majority finds in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 396-97 (1971), it seems to me that the majority has minimized the admonition of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API