Legal Opinion

Mack v. Colleran

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1892PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of Eew York, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order of the General Term of the City Court of New York, which affirmed a judgment of said court and granted a new trial. This was an action for the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien Upon premises in the city of New York.

Read the full summary

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of Eew York, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order of the General Term of the City Court of New York, which affirmed a judgment of said court and granted a new trial. This was an action for the foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien Upon premises in the city of New York. The following is the opinion in full: “ On the 12th day of December, 1889, the defendant Colleran agreed in -writing with defendant Constantine Y. King to erect for him upon his lots in the city of New…

1Opinion of the Court

Earl, Ch. J.,

reads for reversal.

All concur.

Order reversed, and judgment of City Court affirmed.

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. United States v. Johnson, Smathers & RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. National Harrow Co. v. E. Bement & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API