Legal Opinion

Sweep v. Hanson Silo Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 1986No. C2-86-286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Relators, employer and insurer, seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals disapproving a proposed settlement filed by the parties during the pendency of relators’ appeal from a compensation judge’s denial of their petition to discontinue payment of temporary total disability benefits. We affirm.

Relators’ chief contention is that the WCCA was required by Minn.Stat. § 176.-521, subds. 2 and 2a (1984), to accept the proposed settlement. These provisions are applicable when parties to the settlement are represented by counsel, as they were in this case.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Streater/Litton IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Carey v. StadtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Morehouse v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Tatro v. Hartmann's StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Harrison v. Schafer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API