Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd Plan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2016No. 13-17196Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BYBEE, Circuit Judge,

dissenting from Part II.B, but concurring in the judgment:

An ERISA plan administrator has a structural conflict of interest where it “both funds the plan and evaluates the claims.” Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 112, 128 S.Ct. 2343, 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008); see also Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 965 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc). The federal courts have offered at least two ways that such conflicts “should prove less important (perhaps to the vanishing point).” Metro. Life, 554 U.S. at 116, 128 S.Ct. 2343. First, administrators may…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API