Commonwealth v. Pendalli (Heilman's Appeal)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Defendant, John B. Heilman, appeals from the decree of the court below, which found premises owned by him at No. 43 North 13th Street, Philadelphia, to be a common nuisance, because of the sale there of intoxicating liquors in violation of the Act of March 27, 1923, P. L. 34, and ordered the nuisance abated, and further that the premises should not be used or occupied for a period of one year from the date of the decree.
Defendant appeals solely on the question of the propriety of the decree, in consideration of the fact that, from several weeks before the bill was filed to the date…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Engler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. D'Andrea, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1974
- Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968