Men's Wearhouse v. Michael Helms
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOYLE, Justice.
This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of appellee on theories of assault, battery, and false imprisonment. In prosecuting its appeal from a bench trial, appellant failed to timely file a statement of facts. Tex.R.Civ.P. 386. A motion requesting leave for late filing was filed with this court and overruled, and a motion for rehearing was denied. See B.D. Click Co. v. Safari Drilling Corp., 638 S.W.2d 860 *430(Tex.1982). The Texas Supreme Court dismissed the Men’s Wearhouse appeal on this point for lack of jurisdiction. 27 Tex. Sup.Ct.J. 264 (March 10, 1984)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Vanity Fair Properties v. BillingsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- David A. Carl Enterprises, Inc. v. Crow-Shutt 14Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Mullins v. Main Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wells v. Kansas University Endowment Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- San Antonio Villa Del Sol Homeowners Ass'n v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- MacKintosh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Flores v. Arrieta, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- State Bar of Texas v. Grossenbacher, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.