Legal Opinion

Nauman v. Harold K. Beecher & Associates

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1970No. 11579PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEYA, District Judge.

This case was before this Court on a prior appeal from a dismissal of plaintiff’s second amended complaint. The purpose of that appeal was to determine whether said complaint stated a cause of action against the defendant corporate architect and another architect. Briefly, it alleged the defendants were under contract to supervise construction of the Salt Lake City-County Complex; that on October 17, 1963, at the construction site of the east-west utility tunnel which was part of said contract, a cave-in occurred, causing plaintiff’s injuries; that said tunnel was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Paxton v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Baker v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Atlas Tack Corp. v. DonabedMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. 530 East 89 Corp. v. UngerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API