Frazier v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. Held:
1. The evidence, although sharply conflicting, was sufficient so that a rational trior of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Submitted July 9, 1980 Decided September 10, 1980. Darrel L. Hopson, for appellant. Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Jack T. Wimbish, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
2. On the sentencing phase, the state sought to have the defendant punished under the recidivist act, Code Ann. § 27-2511. (Code § 27-2511 as amended Ga. L. 1953,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cofer v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Hinton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- LaPalme v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.