Legal Opinion

Davis v. Berkheimer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 20, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Mills District Court. — Hon. E. B. Woodruff, Judge. Action for damages for breach of an alleged warranty in the sale of a borse. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The plaintiff purchased of the defendant a span of horses. He averred in his petition that he purchased them “under a warranty from the defendant” that *271they were sound. He further averred- that one of the horses was badly wind-broken, and of no value. The defendant’s answer denied that the horse was unsound in any degree at the time of the sale, and affirmed that he was sound and free from defects at .such time. The answer made no denial of the plaintiff’s allegation of warranty. The sole issue of fact tried between the parties was whether the horse was sound or unsound at the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tewkesbury v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. McGrew v. ForsytheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Richardson v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Jackson & Sons v. MottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Schlichting v. RowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thornton v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  2. De Zeeuw v. Fox Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API