Jackson & Sons v. Mott
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from MahasTca District Court. — Hon. David Ryan, Judge. Action to recover for a binder- sold to defendant. There was a trial by jury and a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— In July, 1886, the plaintiff sold and ..delivered to. defendant a Plano binder, and- agreed to accept in payment two horses, twelve years old; The horses were to be delivered by defendant-four', weeks after the sale. After the bargain was consummated *265and the binder wa,s delivered, plaintiffs refused to’ take the horses which, by the terms of the agreement, were to be taken in payment, on the alleged ground that they were warranted to be but twelve years old, whereas in fact they were over twenty years old. Plaintiffs, allege that they demanded a rescission, of the contract and a restoration…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. Hanson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- McDonald Manufacturing Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Jack v. D. M. & Ft. D. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Figge v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richardson v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- White v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Ellis v. BarkleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Laporte Improvement Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Meader v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.