Stile v. COPLEY TP., OHIO
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
(Resolving Doc. Nos. 5 and 29)
DOWD, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, as supplemented and supported. (Doc. No. 5, with Nos. 4 and 14). Defendants have submitted a memorandum in opposition, with supporting documentation (Doc. No. 13), and the plaintiff has filed his reply (Doc. No. 30). The parties have also filed a joint stipula tion with supporting documentation. 1 (Doc. No. 18). 2
On June 7, 2000, after notice to all parties and with all parties represented, the Court conducted a hearing on the preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Monongahela Power Co. v. SchriberDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I. v. Township of LibertyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010