Legal Opinion

Stile v. COPLEY TP., OHIO

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 8, 2000No. 5:00 CV 1309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(Resolving Doc. Nos. 5 and 29)

DOWD, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, as supplemented and supported. (Doc. No. 5, with Nos. 4 and 14). Defendants have submitted a memorandum in opposition, with supporting documentation (Doc. No. 13), and the plaintiff has filed his reply (Doc. No. 30). The parties have also filed a joint stipula tion with supporting documentation. 1 (Doc. No. 18). 2

On June 7, 2000, after notice to all parties and with all parties represented, the Court conducted a hearing on the preliminary injunction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Mason County Medical Ass'n v. KnebelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Monongahela Power Co. v. SchriberDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I. v. Township of LibertyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  4. Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township of LibertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API