Legal Opinion

Lindenmuth v. Steffy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeal, 47PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Erick was the owner of a tractor, operated by Steffy, and trip-leased (with a trailer) to Motor Cargo, Inc. Steffy’s conceded negligence caused the tractor to collide with Lindenmuth’s building. A trespass action resulted in a verdict against all three defendants. Motor Cargo, Inc. has appealed from the refusal to enter judgment non obstante veredicto in its favor. We have con- eluded that the case was properly decided by the lower court.

At the time of the collision with the building, there were cards 12 by 15 inches in size on the doors of the tractor with the name…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Maloy v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Luckett v. ReighardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Curran v. LorchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Shuman Estate v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Mineo v. TanciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Van Vranken v. Fence-CraftIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API