Saint v. Cornwall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 109, Oct. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1901, No. 461, for defendants on case stated in suit of Mary Jane Saint, Elizabeth Hayden, Sarah A. Minnemeyer, Harriet E. Seitz, Samuel C. Reynolds, Joseph W. Reynolds and Benjamin Reynolds v. Catherine Cornwall and 'Andrew Doehla. Case stated in ejectment to determine title to real estate in the tenth ward of Allegheny City.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 109, Oct. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1901, No. 461, for defendants on case stated in suit of Mary Jane Saint, Elizabeth Hayden, Sarah A. Minnemeyer, Harriet E. Seitz, Samuel C. Reynolds, Joseph W. Reynolds and Benjamin Reynolds v. Catherine Cornwall and 'Andrew Doehla. Case stated in ejectment to determine title to real estate in the tenth ward of Allegheny City. Evans, J., filed the following opinion: This is an action of ejectment brought to recover the undivided one half of a certain lot situate in the tenth ward of Allegheny…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
After this case had been argued and was sub judice in the court, the appellant moved for leave to discontinue. As this is objected to by the appellees and would apparently be to tbeir prejudice, leave must be refused.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion .of the court below on the ease stated.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cornwell v. MossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- St. Clement's B. & L. Ass'n v. McCannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Trosky (In Re Trosky)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Lazaran v. SemansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922