Legal Opinion
M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Trosky (In Re Trosky)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 7, 2006No. Bankruptcy No. 5-05-bk-51389. Adversary No. 5-05-ap-50183PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION 1
JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Pending before the Court is the disposition of both the Debtors’ Complaint to Determine Secured Status and Avoid Liens (Doc. No. 1 to 5-05-ap-50183) and M & T Mortgage Corporation’s (“M & T”) Motion for Relief from Stay to proceed with a quiet title and ensuing foreclosure action (Doc. No. 19 to 5-05-bk-51389). For the following reasons, M & T’s Motion for Relief from Stay is denied insofar as it seeks relief to pursue a quiet title action in state court, but granted insofar as it seeks to pursue a foreclosure action in state court. The prayer seeking…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re HammondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re LibbyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Quin v. CallahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re HinkleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Welsh (In re Welsh)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- D'Angelo v. Blue Chip Federal Credit Union (In re D'Angelo)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- FRACTION v. JACKLILY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Fraction v. Jacklily, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.