Legal Opinion

Ex parte Worley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Gage, J., Horry, March, 1898. Petition by Emaline Worlejr for homested in estate of her husband, Coleman Worley. From Circuit decree, the petitioner appeals. Rev. Stat., 2129, 2134; 2 S. C., 216; 30 Vt., 759; 47 P- St., 230. Rev. Stat., 2129; 49 S. C., 41; 19 S. C., 239.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion oí the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The “Case” states the following facts : Coleman Worley died in 1895, leaving as his heirs at law, his widow, Emaline Worley, and his two sons, Jackson Worley and Rey Worley, the issue of a previous marriage, both of whom were of age at the time of the death of the intestate. Prior to and at the time of the death of intestate, the said Jackson Worley, an unmarried man, lived with his father, as a member of his family, and he still lives with petitioner, his step-mother, in the residence of the intestate; the other son, Rey Worley, lived…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dorn v. StidhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. In Re: Snoddy's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Snoddy v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Spigener v. CrewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API