Legal Opinion
Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc.—bay Area v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1954No. 13727_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
In the San Francisco Bay area the growing and marketing of flowers is a substantial business. Air freight transportation has enabled the growers in recent years to sell their flowers in markets formerly denied them.
This case is concerned with some of the aspects of the interstate shipment by air of flowers. 1 The grower, of course, could do business directly with an air carrier without using an air freight forwarder, but if he did so he would be shipping his commodity without the advantage of the better rates one can obtain with a larger bulk. Freight forwarders have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brady Transfer & Storage Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Natural Gas Service Co. v. Serv-Yu Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Brady Transfer & Storage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1948
- Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Pacific Coast Wholesalers' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by16 opinions
- Executive Aviation, Inc. v. National Insurance UnderwritersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- James B. Rombough v. Federal Aviation Administration, and Langhorne M. Bond, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc. And Henry F. Price v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Roger E. Woolsey v. National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Dhl Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.